Skip to content
Fundology

Comparison

SGLN vs IGLT

iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT): what each one is, what it costs, how it has done before and after inflation, how far it fell, and how much of what they hold is the same. Nothing here says which one to choose.

SGLNIGLTStart again

Two to four funds. Each one you add changes the link, so a comparison can be shared.

What differs

Facts from each fund’s own record, side by side. None of them says which fund to choose.

  • SGLN tracks the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt); IGLT tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index.
  • SGLN’s ongoing charge is 0.12% a year against 0.07% for IGLT: about £5 a year more on £10,000.
  • SGLN is in Gold & commodities; IGLT is in Government bonds.
  • SGLN is an ETC; IGLT is an ETF.
  • Their holdings overlap cannot be measured: published holdings are missing for at least one of them.

Growth of £10,000 over 1 month

to · after fund charges, before inflation

From 18/09/2026 to 30/09/2026, £10,000 became £9,618 in SGLN, £9,919 in IGLT, after fund charges and before inflation.
  • SGLN£9,618−3.8%
  • IGLT£9,919−0.8%

The start is the first date every fund has a price (SGLN: prices on record from 18/09/2026). Weekly closes; some series count income reinvested and some do not (see “Measured as” below).

Side by side

SGLN, IGLT: identity, charges, past returns and risk, side by side
MeasureSGLNIGLT
What it is
CategoryGold & commoditiesGovernment bonds
TypeETCETF
ProvideriSharesiShares
TracksLBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt)FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index
IncomeNot statedDistributing
Currency hedgedNoNo
DomicileIrelandIreland
Launched08/04/201101/12/2006
ISA and SIPPISASIPPISASIPP
What it costs
Ongoing charge0.12% a year0.07% a year
On £10,000£12 a year£7 a year
Fund size£22bn£2.5bn
Latest close£60.76£9.49
Past returns, after charges
1 year+10.3%+0.7%
3 years+104.5%+7.2%
5 years+144.3%−20.3%
5 years after inflation+91.0%−37.7%
Measured asincome reinvestedincome reinvested
Ups and downs
Volatility, 5 yearsNot available9.5%
Largest fall, 5 yearsNot available−31.8%10/12/2021 to 14/10/2022
Lowest 12 monthsNot available−27.7%to 14/10/2022
Highest 12 monthsNot available+9.8%to 16/08/2024

Returns: TradingView (delayed data). Inflation: ONS CPIH, latest month published.

Returns run to each fund’s latest close. Past performance is not a guide to future returns. How returns are calculated

Calendar-year returns

Each full calendar year and 2026 so far (to 30/09/2026), in pounds, after charges. The smaller figure is after UK inflation.

Calendar-year returns of SGLN, IGLT in pounds, to 30/09/2026
YearSGLNIGLT
Not available−2.0%after inflation −4.7%
Not available+5.1%after inflation +1.5%
Not available−1.8%after inflation −5.1%
Not available+3.6%after inflation −0.6%
Not available−23.7%after inflation −30.2%
  • SGLN: no calendar-year figures on record.
  • IGLT: income reinvested to 10/07/2026, price only after; to 30/09/2026.
  • Source: Fundology, from recorded closes; inflation ONS CPIH. How calendar-year returns are worked out

Holdings in common

How much of the funds is the same companies at the same weights. The higher it is, the more owning both is like owning one fund twice.

SGLN has no published holdings on record, so the overlap cannot be measured. Holdings come from issuers that publish them (today mainly iShares and Vanguard ETFs); the list grows as more do.

Source: issuer-published holdings, snapshots of SGLN none and IGLT 29/09/2026

Overlap is the sum, company by company, of the smaller of the two weights. How overlap is measured

Sources and dates

Source: TradingView (prices), as of , at least 15 min delayed

Source: fund issuers and the FCA register (charges, identity)

Source: ONS CPIH (inflation, latest month published)

More comparisons

Terms on this page: ongoing charge, real return, accumulating and distributing, volatility, largest fall, holdings overlap, calendar-year returns.